Coverage in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Coverage in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural was 58.6% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Coverage in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for coverage in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -rural in Kyrgyzstan is 58.6%, measured in 2020. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
That represents a change of up 1.1% on the previous year and up 3.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, coverage in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -rural in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 58.6% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 34.6%, in 2006.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 24th of 37 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Coverage in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 34.6% | — |
| 2011 | 56.7% | +63.7% |
| 2012 | 55.2% | -2.5% |
| 2013 | 50.0% | -9.5% |
| 2014 | 48.1% | -3.8% |
| 2015 | 47.2% | -1.8% |
| 2016 | 50.1% | +6.1% |
| 2017 | 54.1% | +7.9% |
| 2018 | 55.1% | +1.8% |
| 2019 | 58.0% | +5.3% |
| 2020 | 58.6% | +1.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.6% | 34.6% | 34.6% | 1 |
| 2010s | 52.7% | 47.2% | 58.0% | 9 |
| 2020s | 58.6% | 58.6% | 58.6% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
- 21 Serbia 64.4% compare
- 22 Republic of Moldova 63.3% compare
- 23 Dominican Republic 60.4% compare
- 25 Kazakhstan 56.9% compare
- 26 Mexico 53.4% compare
- 27 Türkiye 52.8% compare
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is coverage in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -rural in Kyrgyzstan?
- Coverage in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -rural in Kyrgyzstan was 58.6% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest coverage in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -rural recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 58.6% in 2020.
- What is the lowest coverage in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -rural recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 34.6% in 2006.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for coverage in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -rural?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 24th out of 37 countries with data for 2020.
- Is coverage in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -rural rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Coverage in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Social Protection and Labor programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)