Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban in Belarus

Belarus: Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban was 73.3% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
73.3%
Change on year
down 5.6%
World rank
13th
of 39 countries
All-time high
81.7%
in 2012
All-time low
72.9%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban in Belarus, 2008–2019

0204060802008201320192008: 72.92009: 75.42010: 76.12012: 81.72013: 74.52014: 75.12015: 73.82016: 77.22017: 78.62018: 77.72019: 73.3

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -urban in Belarus stood at 73.3%.

The figure is down 5.6% on the previous year and down 2.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -urban in Belarus peaked at 81.7% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 72.9%, in 2008.

Belarus ranks 13th of 39 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 72.9%
2009 75.4% +3.4%
2010 76.1% +1.0%
2012 81.7% +7.4%
2013 74.5% -8.9%
2014 75.1% +0.8%
2015 73.8% -1.7%
2016 77.2% +4.6%
2017 78.6% +1.8%
2018 77.7% -1.1%
2019 73.3% -5.6%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 74.2% 72.9% 75.4% 2
2010s 76.4% 73.3% 81.7% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 10 Panama 78.4% compare
  2. 11 Russia 77.4% compare
  3. 12 Poland 77.2% compare
  4. 14 Armenia 69.9% compare
  5. 15 Uruguay 68.2% compare
  6. 16 Costa Rica 67.7% compare

See the full ranking of 39 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -urban in Belarus?
Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -urban in Belarus was 73.3% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -urban recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 81.7% in 2012.
What is the lowest coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -urban recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 72.9% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -urban?
Belarus ranks 13th out of 39 countries with data for 2019.
Is coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -urban rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is down 2.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/coverage-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-social-protection-and-labor-urban/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/coverage-in-3rd-quintile-percent-all-social-protection-and-labor-urban/belarus/">Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
39 places, 390 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in Social Protection and Labor programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)