Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Belarus

Belarus: Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban was 57.4% in 2019. ▼ Falling

Latest (2019)
57.4%
Change on year
down 1.6%
World rank
3rd
of 31 countries
All-time high
72.0%
in 2009
All-time low
54.9%
in 2012
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Belarus, 2008–2019

0204060802008201320192008: 61.92009: 722010: 64.32012: 54.92013: 58.42014: 61.82015: 58.42016: 60.82017: 58.22018: 58.42019: 57.4

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 57.4% for coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers -urban in 2019.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.6% on the previous year and down 20.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers -urban in Belarus peaked at 72.0% in 2009 and was at its lowest, 54.9%, in 2012.

That places Belarus 3rd out of 31 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.

Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 61.9%
2009 72.0% +16.3%
2010 64.3% -10.7%
2012 54.9% -14.7%
2013 58.4% +6.4%
2014 61.8% +5.8%
2015 58.4% -5.5%
2016 60.8% +4.1%
2017 58.2% -4.3%
2018 58.4% +0.3%
2019 57.4% -1.6%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 67.0% 61.9% 72.0% 2
2010s 59.2% 54.9% 64.3% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 1 Ecuador 77.1% compare
  2. 2 Georgia 60.2% compare
  3. 4 Malawi 50.5% compare
  4. 5 Dominican Republic 46.0% compare
  5. 6 Pakistan 33.5% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers -urban in Belarus?
Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers -urban in Belarus was 57.4% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers -urban recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 72.0% in 2009.
What is the lowest coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers -urban recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 54.9% in 2012.
How does Belarus rank for coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers -urban?
Belarus ranks 3rd out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
Is coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers -urban rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is down 20.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/coverage-in-2nd-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers-urban/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/coverage-in-2nd-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers-urban/belarus/">Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 319 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in Domestic Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)