Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -urban in Belarus

Belarus: Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -urban was 49.8% in 2019. ▼ Falling

Latest (2019)
49.8%
Change on year
down 6.0%
World rank
20th
of 39 countries
All-time high
64.5%
in 2012
All-time low
49.8%
in 2019
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -urban in Belarus, 2008–2019

02040602008201320192008: 64.42009: 63.42010: 58.32012: 64.52013: 62.62014: 62.62015: 61.22016: 61.72017: 57.32018: 532019: 49.8

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 49.8% for coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -urban in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 11 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 6.0% on the previous year and down 21.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -urban in Belarus peaked at 64.5% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 49.8%, in 2019.

Belarus ranks 20th of 39 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.

Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -urban in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -urban in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 64.4%
2009 63.4% -1.5%
2010 58.3% -8.0%
2012 64.5% +10.6%
2013 62.6% -3.0%
2014 62.6% +0.0%
2015 61.2% -2.2%
2016 61.7% +0.8%
2017 57.3% -7.1%
2018 53.0% -7.6%
2019 49.8% -6.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 63.9% 63.4% 64.4% 2
2010s 59.0% 49.8% 64.5% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 17 Dominican Republic 57.0% compare
  2. 18 Uruguay 54.5% compare
  3. 19 Argentina 50.4% compare
  4. 21 Ukraine 46.8% compare
  5. 22 Armenia 43.9% compare
  6. 23 Mexico 40.1% compare

See the full ranking of 39 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -urban in Belarus?
Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -urban in Belarus was 49.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -urban recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 64.5% in 2012.
What is the lowest coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -urban recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 49.8% in 2019.
How does Belarus rank for coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -urban?
Belarus ranks 20th out of 39 countries with data for 2019.
Is coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -urban rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is down 21.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -urban in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/coverage-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-social-assistance-urban/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/coverage-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-social-assistance-urban/belarus/">Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -urban in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
39 places, 390 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in Social Assistance programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)