Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers in Serbia

Serbia: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers was 10.0% in 2022. ▼ Falling

Latest (2022)
10.0%
Change on year
down 21.4%
World rank
26th
of 29 countries
All-time high
27.3%
in 2013
All-time low
10.0%
in 2022
Years of data
8
2007–2022

Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers in Serbia, 2007–2022

01020302007201420222007: 22.92010: 25.52013: 27.32015: 24.12018: 192019: 16.72021: 12.82022: 10

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2022, coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers in Serbia stood at 10.0%. That is the lowest value across all 8 years on record.

The figure is down 21.4% on the previous year and down 63.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers in Serbia peaked at 27.3% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 10.0%, in 2022.

That places Serbia 26th out of 29 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers in Serbia, year by year

Annual values for Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban in Serbia, 2007 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2007 22.9%
2010 25.5% +11.3%
2013 27.3% +7.1%
2015 24.1% -11.7%
2018 19.0% -21.2%
2019 16.7% -12.3%
2021 12.8% -23.4%
2022 10.0% -21.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 22.9% 22.9% 22.9% 1
2010s 22.5% 16.7% 27.3% 5
2020s 11.4% 10.0% 12.8% 2

Countries ranked near Serbia

  1. 24 Pakistan 12.2% compare
  2. 25 Albania 10.8% compare
  3. 27 Costa Rica 8.6% compare
  4. 28 Kyrgyzstan 8.0% compare
  5. 29 Uruguay 4.0% compare

See the full ranking of 29 places →

More work & labour data for Serbia

All data for Serbia →

Frequently asked questions

What is coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers in Serbia?
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers in Serbia was 10.0% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers recorded in Serbia?
The highest recorded value was 27.3% in 2013.
What is the lowest coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers recorded in Serbia?
The lowest recorded value was 10.0% in 2022.
How does Serbia rank for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers?
Serbia ranks 26th out of 29 countries with data for 2022.
Is coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers rising or falling in Serbia?
Over the last ten years it is down 63.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Serbia data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers in Serbia. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/coverage-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-urban/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/coverage-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-urban/serbia/">Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers in Serbia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
29 places, 245 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in Cash Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)