Benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - Domestic in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - Domestic was 0.9% in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - Domestic in Kazakhstan, 2010–2021
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
In 2021, benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic in Kazakhstan stood at 0.9%.
That represents a change of down 28.6% on the previous year and up 280.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic in Kazakhstan peaked at 4.2% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 0.2%, in 2010.
That places Kazakhstan 20th out of 31 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.
Benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - Domestic in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 0.2% | — |
| 2014 | 4.2% | +1629.7% |
| 2015 | 0.8% | -80.1% |
| 2017 | 0.5% | -43.2% |
| 2018 | 1.0% | +113.9% |
| 2019 | 1.1% | +8.7% |
| 2020 | 1.3% | +17.6% |
| 2021 | 0.9% | -28.6% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 0.9% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.7%, 53% of the median. (9 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 0.9% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.9%, 1.0× the median. (19 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.3% | 0.2% | 4.2% | 6 |
| 2020s | 1.1% | 0.9% | 1.3% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 17 Panama 1.1% compare
- 18 Costa Rica 1.0% compare
- 19 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 0.9% compare
- 21 Dominican Republic 0.8% compare
- 22 Chile 0.8% compare
- 23 Sri Lanka 0.7% compare
More work & labour data for Kazakhstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.2152 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.2212 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.2086 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.02 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.25 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 15,866 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 7,093 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 16,815 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 16,857 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 33,672 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic in Kazakhstan?
- Benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic in Kazakhstan was 0.9% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 4.2% in 2014.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2% in 2010.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic?
- Kazakhstan ranks 20th out of 31 countries with data for 2021.
- Is benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 280.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the extreme poor (those below $125 a day) relative to the total benefits going to the population