Benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) -All Social in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) -All Social was 0.0% in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) -All Social in Kazakhstan, 2007–2021
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Kazakhstan recorded 0.0% for benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) -all social in 2021.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1,674.3% on the previous year and down 59.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) -all social in Kazakhstan peaked at 0.2% in 2007 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 2018.
That places Kazakhstan 27th out of 36 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.
Benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) -All Social in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0.2% | — |
| 2010 | 0.1% | -51.1% |
| 2014 | 0.0% | -87.6% |
| 2015 | 0.0% | +11.5% |
| 2017 | 0.0% | -37.6% |
| 2018 | 0.0% | -73.7% |
| 2019 | 0.0% | +367.3% |
| 2020 | 0.0% | -78.3% |
| 2021 | 0.0% | +1674.3% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 0.0% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.2%, 19% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 0.0% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.0%, 88% of the median. (11 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 1 |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 6 |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 24 Colombia 0.1% compare
- 25 Côte d'Ivoire 0.1% compare
- 26 Republic of Moldova 0.0% compare
- 28 Chile 0.0% compare
- 29 South Africa 0.0% compare
- 30 Türkiye 0.0% compare
More work & labour data for Kazakhstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.2152 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.2212 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.2086 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.02 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.25 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 15,866 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 7,093 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 16,815 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 16,857 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 33,672 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) -all social in Kazakhstan?
- Benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) -all social in Kazakhstan was 0.0% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) -all social recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2% in 2007.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) -all social recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 2018.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) -all social?
- Kazakhstan ranks 27th out of 36 countries with data for 2021.
- Is benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) -all social rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 59.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the extreme poor (those below $125 a day) relative to the total benefits going to the population