Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash was 3.9% in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kazakhstan, 2007–2021
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Kazakhstan recorded 3.9% for benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional cash in 2021.
That represents a change of down 17.3% on the previous year and down 5.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional cash in Kazakhstan peaked at 30.7% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 2.0%, in 2007.
Kazakhstan ranks 21st of 24 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 2.0% | — |
| 2010 | 4.1% | +102.2% |
| 2014 | 30.7% | +641.7% |
| 2015 | 20.4% | -33.4% |
| 2017 | 7.8% | -61.9% |
| 2018 | 9.8% | +25.8% |
| 2019 | 8.3% | -14.8% |
| 2020 | 4.7% | -43.3% |
| 2021 | 3.9% | -17.3% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 3.9% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 7.9%, 49% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 3.9% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 9.7%, 40% of the median. (16 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.0% | 2.0% | 2.0% | 1 |
| 2010s | 13.5% | 4.1% | 30.7% | 6 |
| 2020s | 4.3% | 3.9% | 4.7% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 18 Kyrgyzstan 6.5% compare
- 19 Kosovo 5.3% compare
- 19 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 5.3% compare
- 22 Georgia 3.7% compare
- 23 Turkey 2.9% compare
- 24 Costa Rica 2.8% compare
More work & labour data for Kazakhstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.2152 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.2212 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.2086 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.02 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.25 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 15,866 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 7,093 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 16,815 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 16,857 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 33,672 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional cash in Kazakhstan?
- Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional cash in Kazakhstan was 3.9% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 30.7% in 2014.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.0% in 2007.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional cash?
- Kazakhstan ranks 21st out of 24 countries with data for 2021.
- Is benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional cash rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the richestquintile relative to the total benefits going to the population