Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International was 39.6% in 2020. ▼ Falling
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Kyrgyzstan recorded 39.6% for benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in 2020.
The figure is up 17.2% on the previous year and down 2.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 51.7% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 26.0%, in 2013.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th of 27 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 51.7% | — |
| 2011 | 40.4% | -21.8% |
| 2012 | 44.1% | +9.1% |
| 2013 | 26.0% | -41.0% |
| 2014 | 39.3% | +51.2% |
| 2015 | 31.7% | -19.2% |
| 2016 | 39.0% | +23.0% |
| 2017 | 36.5% | -6.5% |
| 2018 | 36.4% | -0.2% |
| 2019 | 33.8% | -7.4% |
| 2020 | 39.6% | +17.2% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 39.6% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 38.8%, 1.0× the median. (8 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.7% | 51.7% | 51.7% | 1 |
| 2010s | 36.4% | 26.0% | 44.1% | 9 |
| 2020s | 39.6% | 39.6% | 39.6% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
- 15 Georgia 42.6% compare
- 16 Dominican Republic 42.0% compare
- 17 Burkina Faso 40.0% compare
- 19 Viet Nam 39.5% compare
- 20 El Salvador 38.9% compare
- 21 Poland 38.1% compare
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Kyrgyzstan?
- Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Kyrgyzstan was 39.6% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 51.7% in 2006.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 26.0% in 2013.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th out of 27 countries with data for 2020.
- Is benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the richestquintile relative to the total benefits going to the population