Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private was 53.9% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2020, benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Kyrgyzstan stood at 53.9%.
That represents a change of down 17.2% on the previous year and up 24.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 65.1% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 40.0%, in 2015.
That places Kyrgyzstan 3rd out of 31 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 46.6% | — |
| 2011 | 43.3% | -7.0% |
| 2012 | 40.5% | -6.4% |
| 2013 | 48.1% | +18.7% |
| 2014 | 52.0% | +8.0% |
| 2015 | 40.0% | -22.9% |
| 2016 | 49.2% | +22.9% |
| 2017 | 44.3% | -10.1% |
| 2018 | 50.9% | +14.9% |
| 2019 | 65.1% | +28.0% |
| 2020 | 53.9% | -17.2% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 53.9% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 44.7%, 1.2× the median. (9 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.6% | 46.6% | 46.6% | 1 |
| 2010s | 48.1% | 40.0% | 65.1% | 9 |
| 2020s | 53.9% | 53.9% | 53.9% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
- 1 Malawi 55.4% compare
- 2 Burkina Faso 54.0% compare
- 4 Kazakhstan 51.9% compare
- 5 Armenia 51.3% compare
- 6 Brazil 46.0% compare
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Kyrgyzstan?
- Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Kyrgyzstan was 53.9% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 65.1% in 2019.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 40.0% in 2015.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd out of 31 countries with data for 2020.
- Is benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 24.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the richestquintile relative to the total benefits going to the population