Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Georgia
Georgia: Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private was 31.3% in 2021. ▼ Falling
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Georgia, 2011–2021
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
The most recent figure for benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Georgia is 31.3%, measured in 2021. That is the lowest value across all 11 years on record.
That represents a change of down 12.4% on the previous year and down 26.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Georgia peaked at 43.2% in 2015 and was at its lowest, 31.3%, in 2021.
Georgia ranks 22nd of 31 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Georgia, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 42.8% | — |
| 2012 | 37.0% | -13.5% |
| 2013 | 33.3% | -9.9% |
| 2014 | 37.2% | +11.4% |
| 2015 | 43.2% | +16.4% |
| 2016 | 40.8% | -5.6% |
| 2017 | 41.5% | +1.6% |
| 2018 | 37.1% | -10.4% |
| 2019 | 38.9% | +4.7% |
| 2020 | 35.7% | -8.2% |
| 2021 | 31.3% | -12.4% |
Georgia compared with similar countries
- Georgia's 31.3% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 44.4%, 70% of the median. (9 countries reporting)
- Georgia's 31.3% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 32.1%, 97% of the median. (19 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 39.1% | 33.3% | 43.2% | 9 |
| 2020s | 33.5% | 31.3% | 35.7% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Georgia
More work & labour data for Georgia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.5749 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.5695 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.5795 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.16 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.0234 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 2,483 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 911.09 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,505 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,465 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 2,969 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Georgia?
- Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Georgia was 31.3% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Georgia?
- The highest recorded value was 43.2% in 2015.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Georgia?
- The lowest recorded value was 31.3% in 2021.
- How does Georgia rank for benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private?
- Georgia ranks 22nd out of 31 countries with data for 2021.
- Is benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Georgia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 26.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Georgia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the richestquintile relative to the total benefits going to the population