Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Argentina
Argentina: Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private was 34.8% in 2022. ▲ Rising
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Argentina, 2006–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
In 2022, benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Argentina stood at 34.8%.
That represents a change of up 13.5% on the previous year and up 17.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Argentina peaked at 43.9% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 12.5%, in 2016.
That places Argentina 14th out of 31 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 10 years of available data.
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Argentina, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 35.4% | — |
| 2010 | 35.8% | +0.9% |
| 2013 | 29.6% | -17.2% |
| 2016 | 12.5% | -57.7% |
| 2017 | 34.2% | +173.7% |
| 2018 | 36.4% | +6.3% |
| 2019 | 35.5% | -2.5% |
| 2020 | 43.9% | +23.7% |
| 2021 | 30.7% | -30.0% |
| 2022 | 34.8% | +13.5% |
Argentina compared with similar countries
- Argentina's 34.8% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 32.1%, 1.1× the median. (19 countries reporting)
- Argentina's 34.8% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 32.1%, 1.1× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.4% | 35.4% | 35.4% | 1 |
| 2010s | 30.7% | 12.5% | 36.4% | 6 |
| 2020s | 36.5% | 30.7% | 43.9% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Argentina
More work & labour data for Argentina
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.7783 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.7715 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.7851 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.514 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 52,564 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 2,664 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 19,145 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 19,111 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 38,256 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Argentina?
- Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Argentina was 34.8% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Argentina?
- The highest recorded value was 43.9% in 2020.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Argentina?
- The lowest recorded value was 12.5% in 2016.
- How does Argentina rank for benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private?
- Argentina ranks 14th out of 31 countries with data for 2022.
- Is benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Argentina?
- Over the last ten years it is up 17.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Argentina data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the richestquintile relative to the total benefits going to the population