Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social in Paraguay
Paraguay: Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social was 58.0% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social in Paraguay, 2007–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Paraguay recorded 58.0% for benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in 2022.
The figure is up 3.1% on the previous year and down 18.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Paraguay peaked at 83.6% in 2007 and was at its lowest, 46.4%, in 2019.
That places Paraguay 9th out of 37 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 16 years of available data.
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social in Paraguay, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 83.6% | — |
| 2008 | 74.0% | -11.5% |
| 2009 | 78.2% | +5.8% |
| 2010 | 75.7% | -3.2% |
| 2011 | 72.0% | -4.9% |
| 2012 | 71.1% | -1.3% |
| 2013 | 61.3% | -13.8% |
| 2014 | 60.9% | -0.5% |
| 2015 | 63.7% | +4.5% |
| 2016 | 65.8% | +3.3% |
| 2017 | 62.6% | -4.9% |
| 2018 | 48.7% | -22.1% |
| 2019 | 46.4% | -4.7% |
| 2020 | 47.6% | +2.5% |
| 2021 | 56.2% | +18.1% |
| 2022 | 58.0% | +3.1% |
Paraguay compared with similar countries
- Paraguay's 58.0% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 39.9%, 1.5× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Paraguay's 58.0% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 48.1%, 1.2× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.6% | 74.0% | 83.6% | 3 |
| 2010s | 62.8% | 46.4% | 75.7% | 10 |
| 2020s | 53.9% | 47.6% | 58.0% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Paraguay
More work & labour data for Paraguay
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.23 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.2175 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.2425 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.2 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.9753 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 6,607 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 2,290 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 4,534 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 4,514 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 9,048 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Paraguay?
- Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Paraguay was 58.0% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social recorded in Paraguay?
- The highest recorded value was 83.6% in 2007.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social recorded in Paraguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 46.4% in 2019.
- How does Paraguay rank for benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social?
- Paraguay ranks 9th out of 37 countries with data for 2022.
- Is benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social rising or falling in Paraguay?
- Over the last ten years it is down 18.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Paraguay data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the richestquintile relative to the total benefits going to the population