Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers in Poland
Poland: Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers was 16.8% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers in Poland is 16.8%, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
That represents a change of up 11.9% on the previous year and up 79.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers in Poland peaked at 16.8% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 9.1%, in 2010.
Poland ranks 9th of 24 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.
Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 12.9% | — |
| 2006 | 13.2% | +2.2% |
| 2007 | 12.5% | -4.9% |
| 2008 | 11.5% | -7.9% |
| 2009 | 9.4% | -18.8% |
| 2010 | 9.1% | -2.5% |
| 2011 | 10.8% | +17.8% |
| 2012 | 10.0% | -7.2% |
| 2015 | 11.2% | +12.2% |
| 2016 | 11.6% | +3.7% |
| 2017 | 15.0% | +29.5% |
| 2019 | 16.8% | +11.9% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 16.8% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 14.9%, 1.1× the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Poland's 16.8% is above the median for high income countries, which is 13.7%, 1.2× the median. (5 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.9% | 9.4% | 13.2% | 5 |
| 2010s | 12.1% | 9.1% | 16.8% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers in Poland?
- Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers in Poland was 16.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 16.8% in 2019.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 9.1% in 2010.
- How does Poland rank for benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers?
- Poland ranks 9th out of 24 countries with data for 2019.
- Is benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 79.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the fourth quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population