Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers in Chile
Chile: Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers was 12.2% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers in Chile, 2006–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2022, benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers in Chile stood at 12.2%. That is the lowest value across all 8 years on record.
That represents a change of down 24.0% on the previous year and down 36.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers in Chile peaked at 19.2% in 2011 and was at its lowest, 12.2%, in 2022.
That places Chile 19th out of 24 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers in Chile, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 19.0% | — |
| 2009 | 16.6% | -12.9% |
| 2011 | 19.2% | +16.1% |
| 2013 | 17.3% | -10.1% |
| 2015 | 17.6% | +1.7% |
| 2017 | 17.2% | -2.0% |
| 2020 | 16.1% | -6.6% |
| 2022 | 12.2% | -24.0% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 12.2% is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 21.1%, 58% of the median. (6 countries reporting)
- Chile's 12.2% is below the median for high income countries, which is 13.7%, 89% of the median. (5 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.8% | 16.6% | 19.0% | 2 |
| 2010s | 17.8% | 17.2% | 19.2% | 4 |
| 2020s | 14.2% | 12.2% | 16.1% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 16 Romania 13.7% compare
- 17 Sri Lanka 13.5% compare
- 18 Costa Rica 13.4% compare
- 20 Kazakhstan 11.7% compare
- 21 Kosovo 10.0% compare
- 21 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 10.0% compare
More work & labour data for Chile
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.14 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.14 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.62 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.2334 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 19,028 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,690 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 6,735 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 6,695 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 13,431 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers in Chile?
- Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers in Chile was 12.2% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 19.2% in 2011.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 12.2% in 2022.
- How does Chile rank for benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers?
- Chile ranks 19th out of 24 countries with data for 2022.
- Is benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 36.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the fourth quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population