Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private was 17.1% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in Kyrgyzstan is 17.1%, measured in 2020.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 6.9% on the previous year and up 26.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 19.7% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 12.9%, in 2006.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th of 27 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 12.9% | — |
| 2011 | 13.5% | +4.9% |
| 2012 | 14.1% | +4.0% |
| 2013 | 19.7% | +40.1% |
| 2014 | 14.0% | -29.1% |
| 2015 | 16.3% | +16.2% |
| 2016 | 16.6% | +2.0% |
| 2017 | 18.3% | +10.1% |
| 2018 | 14.8% | -18.8% |
| 2019 | 16.0% | +8.1% |
| 2020 | 17.1% | +6.9% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 17.1% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 16.5%, 1.0× the median. (8 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.9% | 12.9% | 12.9% | 1 |
| 2010s | 15.9% | 13.5% | 19.7% | 9 |
| 2020s | 17.1% | 17.1% | 17.1% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
- 4 El Salvador 19.4% compare
- 5 Poland 18.8% compare
- 6 Mexico 18.1% compare
- 8 Republic of Moldova 16.7% compare
- 9 Honduras 16.5% compare
- 10 Dominican Republic 16.3% compare
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in Kyrgyzstan?
- Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in Kyrgyzstan was 17.1% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 19.7% in 2013.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 12.9% in 2006.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - international private?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th out of 27 countries with data for 2020.
- Is benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - international private rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 26.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the third quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population