Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and was 9.6% in 2022. ▲ Rising
Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Costa Rica, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2022, benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Costa Rica stood at 9.6%.
That represents a change of down 12.0% on the previous year and down 15.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Costa Rica peaked at 13.7% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 9.6%, in 2014.
Costa Rica ranks 32nd of 36 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 13 years of available data.
Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 10.1% | — |
| 2010 | 11.3% | +11.7% |
| 2011 | 10.6% | -5.8% |
| 2012 | 11.4% | +6.9% |
| 2014 | 9.6% | -15.3% |
| 2015 | 11.2% | +16.5% |
| 2016 | 12.4% | +10.1% |
| 2017 | 11.3% | -8.6% |
| 2018 | 11.0% | -2.8% |
| 2019 | 11.3% | +3.2% |
| 2020 | 13.7% | +20.6% |
| 2021 | 11.0% | -19.7% |
| 2022 | 9.6% | -12.0% |
Costa Rica compared with similar countries
- Costa Rica's 9.6% is below the median for high income countries, which is 17.7%, 55% of the median. (6 countries reporting)
- Costa Rica's 9.6% is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 12.7%, 76% of the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.1% | 10.1% | 10.1% | 1 |
| 2010s | 11.1% | 9.6% | 12.4% | 9 |
| 2020s | 11.4% | 9.6% | 13.7% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
More work & labour data for Costa Rica
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.9965 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.9952 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.9977 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.61 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.29 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 5,205 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 569.35 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,908 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,868 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 3,776 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Costa Rica?
- Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Costa Rica was 9.6% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 13.7% in 2020.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 9.6% in 2014.
- How does Costa Rica rank for benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Costa Rica ranks 32nd out of 36 countries with data for 2022.
- Is benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is down 15.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the third quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population