Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance was 14.6% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
In 2020, benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance in Kyrgyzstan stood at 14.6%.
That represents a change of down 0.1% on the previous year and up 7.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 15.8% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 11.1%, in 2015.
That places Kyrgyzstan 24th out of 35 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 12.6% | — |
| 2011 | 13.6% | +8.5% |
| 2012 | 15.1% | +10.4% |
| 2013 | 14.5% | -3.8% |
| 2014 | 15.8% | +9.0% |
| 2015 | 11.1% | -29.6% |
| 2016 | 14.8% | +32.9% |
| 2017 | 14.6% | -0.8% |
| 2018 | 12.8% | -12.3% |
| 2019 | 14.6% | +13.6% |
| 2020 | 14.6% | -0.1% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 14.6% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 14.7%, 99% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.6% | 12.6% | 12.6% | 1 |
| 2010s | 14.1% | 11.1% | 15.8% | 9 |
| 2020s | 14.6% | 14.6% | 14.6% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
- 21 Georgia 15.9% compare
- 22 Republic of Moldova 15.0% compare
- 23 Belarus 14.8% compare
- 25 Costa Rica 13.6% compare
- 26 Kazakhstan 13.2% compare
- 27 Brazil 12.9% compare
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance in Kyrgyzstan?
- Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance in Kyrgyzstan was 14.6% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 15.8% in 2014.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 11.1% in 2015.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 24th out of 35 countries with data for 2020.
- Is benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the third quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population