Benefits incidence in 2nd … incidence International urban in Moldova

Moldova: Benefits incidence in 2nd … incidence International urban was 12.2% in 2018. ▼ Falling

Latest (2018)
12.2%
Change on year
down 17.6%
World rank
8th
of 27 countries
All-time high
19.0%
in 2012
All-time low
12.2%
in 2018
Years of data
5
2010–2018

Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Moldova, 2010–2018

051015202010201420182010: 13.42012: 192013: 15.22017: 14.82018: 12.2

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2018, benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Moldova stood at 12.2%. That is the lowest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is down 17.6% on the previous year and down 8.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Moldova peaked at 19.0% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 12.2%, in 2018.

Moldova ranks 8th of 27 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Benefits incidence in 2nd … incidence International urban in Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban in Moldova, 2010 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2010 13.4% —
2012 19.0% +41.9%
2013 15.2% -20.4%
2017 14.8% -2.3%
2018 12.2% -17.6%

Moldova compared with similar countries

  • Moldova's 12.2% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 12.3%, 99% of the median. (8 countries reporting)
  • Moldova's 12.2% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 10.1%, 1.2× the median. (17 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 5 Kyrgyzstan 14.3% compare
  2. 6 Mexico 13.9% compare
  3. 7 Georgia 12.4% compare
  4. 9 El Salvador 11.9% compare
  5. 10 Armenia 11.9% compare
  6. 11 Honduras 10.9% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Moldova?
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Moldova was 12.2% in 2018, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 19.0% in 2012.
What is the lowest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 12.2% in 2018.
How does Moldova rank for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
Moldova ranks 8th out of 27 countries with data for 2018.
Is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is down 8.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-2nd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers-urban/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-2nd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers-urban/moldova/">Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 259 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population