Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Serbia

Serbia: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private was 11.1% in 2022. ▼ Falling

Latest (2022)
11.1%
Change on year
down 25.5%
World rank
10th
of 27 countries
All-time high
16.9%
in 2010
All-time low
11.1%
in 2022
Years of data
8
2007–2022

Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Serbia, 2007–2022

0510152007201420222007: 13.6 preT2010: 16.9 preT2013: 11.4 preT2015: 13.5 preT2018: 14.7 preT2019: 13.6 preT2021: 14.8 preT2022: 11.1 preT

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.

Analysis

In 2022, benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Serbia stood at 11.1%. That is the lowest value across all 8 years on record.

That represents a change of down 25.5% on the previous year and down 2.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Serbia peaked at 16.9% in 2010 and was at its lowest, 11.1%, in 2022.

That places Serbia 10th out of 27 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.

Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Serbia, year by year

Annual values for Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers (preT) in Serbia, 2007 to 2022.
Year preT Change
2007 13.6%
2010 16.9% +24.7%
2013 11.4% -32.7%
2015 13.5% +18.2%
2018 14.7% +9.6%
2019 13.6% -8.0%
2021 14.8% +9.5%
2022 11.1% -25.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 13.6% 13.6% 13.6% 1
2010s 14.0% 11.4% 16.9% 5
2020s 13.0% 11.1% 14.8% 2

Countries ranked near Serbia

  1. 7 Republic of Moldova 13.4% compare
  2. 8 El Salvador 12.3% compare
  3. 9 Burkina Faso 12.2% compare
  4. 11 Kosovo 9.9% compare
  5. 11 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 9.9% compare
  6. 13 Costa Rica 9.5% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Serbia

All data for Serbia →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Serbia?
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Serbia was 11.1% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Serbia?
The highest recorded value was 16.9% in 2010.
What is the lowest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Serbia?
The lowest recorded value was 11.1% in 2022.
How does Serbia rank for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
Serbia ranks 10th out of 27 countries with data for 2022.
Is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private rising or falling in Serbia?
Over the last ten years it is down 2.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Serbia data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Serbia. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-2nd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers-pret/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-2nd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers-pret/serbia/">Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Serbia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers (preT)
Unit
preT
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 266 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population