Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers was 17.6% in 2022. ▲ Rising
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Costa Rica, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2022, benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Costa Rica stood at 17.6%.
That represents a change of up 3.4% on the previous year and up 87.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Costa Rica peaked at 20.9% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 9.4%, in 2012.
That places Costa Rica 6th out of 31 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 13 years of available data.
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 17.1% | — |
| 2010 | 12.9% | -24.8% |
| 2011 | 19.4% | +50.3% |
| 2012 | 9.4% | -51.6% |
| 2014 | 14.9% | +59.0% |
| 2015 | 16.4% | +9.8% |
| 2016 | 15.3% | -6.5% |
| 2017 | 15.9% | +3.7% |
| 2018 | 17.7% | +11.3% |
| 2019 | 17.5% | -1.3% |
| 2020 | 20.9% | +19.5% |
| 2021 | 17.0% | -18.6% |
| 2022 | 17.6% | +3.4% |
Costa Rica compared with similar countries
- Costa Rica's 17.6% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 16.6%, 1.1× the median. (15 countries reporting)
- Costa Rica's 17.6% is above the median for high income countries, which is 16.9%, 1.0× the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.1% | 17.1% | 17.1% | 1 |
| 2010s | 15.5% | 9.4% | 19.4% | 9 |
| 2020s | 18.5% | 17.0% | 20.9% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
More work & labour data for Costa Rica
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.9965 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.9952 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.9977 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.61 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.29 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 5,205 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 569.35 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,908 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,868 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 3,776 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Costa Rica?
- Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Costa Rica was 17.6% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 20.9% in 2020.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 9.4% in 2012.
- How does Costa Rica rank for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Costa Rica ranks 6th out of 31 countries with data for 2022.
- Is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 87.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population