Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban was 14.1% in 2020. ▼ Falling
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Kyrgyzstan recorded 14.1% for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in 2020.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.2% on the previous year and down 15.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 21.2% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 13.6%, in 2015.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 34 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 21.2% | — |
| 2011 | 16.8% | -20.7% |
| 2012 | 16.7% | -0.4% |
| 2013 | 16.4% | -1.6% |
| 2014 | 15.0% | -8.6% |
| 2015 | 13.6% | -9.6% |
| 2016 | 15.3% | +12.8% |
| 2017 | 14.0% | -8.9% |
| 2018 | 14.9% | +6.5% |
| 2019 | 14.3% | -3.9% |
| 2020 | 14.1% | -1.2% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 14.1% is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 4.2%, 3.4× the median. (5 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's 14.1% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 17.8%, 79% of the median. (11 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.2% | 21.2% | 21.2% | 1 |
| 2010s | 15.2% | 13.6% | 16.8% | 9 |
| 2020s | 14.1% | 14.1% | 14.1% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Kyrgyzstan?
- Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Kyrgyzstan was 14.1% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 21.2% in 2006.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 13.6% in 2015.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th out of 34 countries with data for 2020.
- Is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 15.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population