Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Moldova

Moldova: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural was 17.8% in 2018. ▼ Falling

Latest (2018)
17.8%
Change on year
up 8.5%
World rank
5th
of 31 countries
All-time high
20.5%
in 2013
All-time low
16.4%
in 2017
Years of data
5
2010–2018

Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Moldova, 2010–2018

051015202010201420182010: 18.62012: 17.62013: 20.52017: 16.42018: 17.8

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2018, benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Moldova stood at 17.8%.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 8.5% on the previous year and down 4.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Moldova peaked at 20.5% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 16.4%, in 2017.

Moldova ranks 5th of 31 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Moldova, 2010 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2010 18.6% —
2012 17.6% -5.2%
2013 20.5% +16.3%
2017 16.4% -19.9%
2018 17.8% +8.5%

Moldova compared with similar countries

  • Moldova's 17.8% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 15.7%, 1.1× the median. (11 countries reporting)
  • Moldova's 17.8% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 9.3%, 1.9× the median. (20 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 2 Kosovo 20.0% compare
  2. 2 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 20.0% compare
  3. 4 Ukraine 19.5% compare
  4. 6 Armenia 17.3% compare
  5. 7 Kyrgyzstan 15.7% compare
  6. 8 Poland 15.4% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More work & labour data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Moldova?
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Moldova was 17.8% in 2018, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 20.5% in 2013.
What is the lowest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 16.4% in 2017.
How does Moldova rank for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
Moldova ranks 5th out of 31 countries with data for 2018.
Is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is down 4.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-social-insurance-rural/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-social-insurance-rural/moldova/">Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 292 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population