Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash in El Salvador
El Salvador: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash was 14.5% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash in El Salvador, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash in El Salvador is 14.5%, measured in 2022. That is the lowest value across all 8 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 12.6% on the previous year and down 59.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash in El Salvador peaked at 49.4% in 2008 and was at its lowest, 14.5%, in 2022.
That places El Salvador 24th out of 26 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash in El Salvador, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 49.4% | — |
| 2009 | 45.9% | -7.1% |
| 2010 | 42.7% | -7.0% |
| 2011 | 30.5% | -28.6% |
| 2012 | 35.7% | +17.1% |
| 2014 | 28.2% | -21.0% |
| 2021 | 16.6% | -41.0% |
| 2022 | 14.5% | -12.6% |
El Salvador compared with similar countries
- El Salvador's 14.5% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 31.6%, 46% of the median. (18 countries reporting)
- El Salvador's 14.5% is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 23.4%, 62% of the median. (8 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.7% | 45.9% | 49.4% | 2 |
| 2010s | 34.3% | 28.2% | 42.7% | 4 |
| 2020s | 15.6% | 14.5% | 16.6% | 2 |
Countries ranked near El Salvador
More work & labour data for El Salvador
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.8531 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.8121 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.893 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.72 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.2563 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 5,984 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,013 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,591 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,482 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 5,073 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash in El Salvador?
- Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash in El Salvador was 14.5% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash recorded in El Salvador?
- The highest recorded value was 49.4% in 2008.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash recorded in El Salvador?
- The lowest recorded value was 14.5% in 2022.
- How does El Salvador rank for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash?
- El Salvador ranks 24th out of 26 countries with data for 2022.
- Is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash rising or falling in El Salvador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 59.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this El Salvador data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population