Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in El Salvador
El Salvador: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International was 6.5% in 2022. ▲ Rising
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in El Salvador, 2007–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2022, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in El Salvador stood at 6.5%.
The figure is up 12.8% on the previous year and up 31.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in El Salvador peaked at 7.9% in 2017 and was at its lowest, 4.1%, in 2010.
That places El Salvador 12th out of 27 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 14 years of available data.
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in El Salvador, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 4.6% | — |
| 2008 | 4.7% | +1.6% |
| 2009 | 4.1% | -11.2% |
| 2010 | 4.1% | -1.2% |
| 2011 | 4.8% | +18.7% |
| 2012 | 5.0% | +2.5% |
| 2014 | 5.7% | +14.7% |
| 2015 | 6.4% | +12.3% |
| 2016 | 5.9% | -8.2% |
| 2017 | 7.9% | +35.4% |
| 2018 | 7.8% | -1.7% |
| 2019 | 7.6% | -3.0% |
| 2021 | 5.8% | -23.7% |
| 2022 | 6.5% | +12.8% |
El Salvador compared with similar countries
- El Salvador's 6.5% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 5.6%, 1.2× the median. (17 countries reporting)
- El Salvador's 6.5% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 3.7%, 1.7× the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.5% | 4.1% | 4.7% | 3 |
| 2010s | 6.1% | 4.1% | 7.9% | 9 |
| 2020s | 6.1% | 5.8% | 6.5% | 2 |
Countries ranked near El Salvador
More work & labour data for El Salvador
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.8531 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.8121 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.893 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.72 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.2563 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 5,984 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,013 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,591 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,482 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 5,073 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in El Salvador?
- Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in El Salvador was 6.5% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international recorded in El Salvador?
- The highest recorded value was 7.9% in 2017.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international recorded in El Salvador?
- The lowest recorded value was 4.1% in 2010.
- How does El Salvador rank for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- El Salvador ranks 12th out of 27 countries with data for 2022.
- Is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international rising or falling in El Salvador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 31.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this El Salvador data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population