Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Ecuador
Ecuador: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International was 2.7% in 2022. ▬ Flat
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Ecuador, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 2.7% for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in 2022.
The figure is down 45.6% on the previous year and down 63.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Ecuador peaked at 7.3% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 2.0%, in 2020.
That places Ecuador 25th out of 27 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2.5% | — |
| 2010 | 2.1% | -17.4% |
| 2011 | 3.1% | +49.4% |
| 2012 | 7.3% | +132.0% |
| 2014 | 2.4% | -67.4% |
| 2015 | 3.1% | +28.8% |
| 2016 | 3.5% | +15.6% |
| 2017 | 3.9% | +11.4% |
| 2018 | 3.7% | -5.2% |
| 2019 | 3.5% | -6.6% |
| 2020 | 2.0% | -43.6% |
| 2021 | 4.9% | +150.4% |
| 2022 | 2.7% | -45.6% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 2.7% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 7.0%, 38% of the median. (17 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 2.7% is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 5.5%, 49% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 1 |
| 2010s | 3.6% | 2.1% | 7.3% | 9 |
| 2020s | 3.2% | 2.0% | 4.9% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 22 Pakistan 3.2% compare
- 23 Türkiye 3.1% compare
- 24 Viet Nam 2.7% compare
- 26 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 2.1% compare
- 27 Costa Rica 1.3% compare
More work & labour data for Ecuador
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.578 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.567 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.589 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.04 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.13 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 17,174 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 5,794 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,543 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,549 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,092 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Ecuador?
- Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Ecuador was 2.7% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 7.3% in 2012.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.0% in 2020.
- How does Ecuador rank for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Ecuador ranks 25th out of 27 countries with data for 2022.
- Is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 63.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population