Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Belarus
Belarus: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private was 12.4% in 2019. ▼ Falling
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2019, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Belarus stood at 12.4%.
The figure is up 7.4% on the previous year and up 10.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Belarus peaked at 17.2% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 11.1%, in 2010.
Belarus ranks 11th of 30 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 14.7% | — |
| 2009 | 11.3% | -23.6% |
| 2010 | 11.1% | -1.7% |
| 2012 | 17.2% | +55.2% |
| 2013 | 16.4% | -4.5% |
| 2014 | 11.9% | -27.3% |
| 2015 | 11.8% | -1.4% |
| 2016 | 11.8% | +0.6% |
| 2017 | 13.9% | +17.5% |
| 2018 | 11.6% | -16.7% |
| 2019 | 12.4% | +7.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.0% | 11.3% | 14.7% | 2 |
| 2010s | 13.1% | 11.1% | 17.2% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 8 El Salvador 13.3% compare
- 9 Republic of Moldova 13.0% compare
- 10 Türkiye 12.4% compare
- 12 Brazil 11.7% compare
- 13 Mexico 10.9% compare
- 14 Kazakhstan 10.9% compare
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Belarus?
- Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Belarus was 12.4% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 17.2% in 2012.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 11.1% in 2010.
- How does Belarus rank for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Belarus ranks 11th out of 30 countries with data for 2019.
- Is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 10.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population