Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Chile

Chile: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private was 12.2% in 2022. ▬ Flat

Latest (2022)
12.2%
Change on year
down 15.0%
World rank
9th
of 31 countries
All-time high
14.4%
in 2020
All-time low
12.2%
in 2022
Years of data
6
2011–2022

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Chile, 2011–2022

0510152011201620222011: 13.9 preT2013: 12.8 preT2015: 14.3 preT2017: 13.1 preT2020: 14.4 preT2022: 12.2 preT

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.

Analysis

In 2022, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Chile stood at 12.2%. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is down 15.0% on the previous year and down 11.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Chile peaked at 14.4% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 12.2%, in 2022.

That places Chile 9th out of 31 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Chile, year by year

Annual values for Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT) in Chile, 2011 to 2022.
Year preT Change
2011 13.9%
2013 12.8% -7.9%
2015 14.3% +12.0%
2017 13.1% -8.3%
2020 14.4% +9.8%
2022 12.2% -15.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 13.5% 12.8% 14.3% 4
2020s 13.3% 12.2% 14.4% 2

Countries ranked near Chile

  1. 6 Thailand 13.8% compare
  2. 7 Mexico 13.8% compare
  3. 8 Paraguay 13.2% compare
  4. 10 Colombia 12.1% compare
  5. 11 Republic of Moldova 11.9% compare
  6. 12 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 11.1% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More work & labour data for Chile

All data for Chile →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Chile?
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Chile was 12.2% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Chile?
The highest recorded value was 14.4% in 2020.
What is the lowest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Chile?
The lowest recorded value was 12.2% in 2022.
How does Chile rank for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
Chile ranks 9th out of 31 countries with data for 2022.
Is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Chile?
Over the last ten years it is down 11.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Chile data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Chile. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-pret/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-pret/chile/">Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Chile</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT)
Unit
preT
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 318 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population