Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Belarus
Belarus: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social was 35.8% in 2019. ▬ Flat
Latest (2019)
35.8%
Change on year
down 2.9%
World rank
8th
of 37 countries
All-time high
42.1%
in 2016
All-time low
33.0%
in 2017
Years of data
11
2008–2019
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 35.8% for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in 2019.
The figure is down 2.9% on the previous year and down 2.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Belarus peaked at 42.1% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 33.0%, in 2017.
Belarus ranks 8th of 37 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Belarus, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 34.8% | — |
| 2009 | 36.6% | +5.2% |
| 2010 | 34.4% | -6.1% |
| 2012 | 33.6% | -2.2% |
| 2013 | 34.4% | +2.1% |
| 2014 | 33.7% | -1.8% |
| 2015 | 34.0% | +0.8% |
| 2016 | 42.1% | +23.9% |
| 2017 | 33.0% | -21.7% |
| 2018 | 36.9% | +11.9% |
| 2019 | 35.8% | -2.9% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 35.8% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 25.6%, 1.4× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 35.8% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 35.5%, 1.0× the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.7% | 34.8% | 36.6% | 2 |
| 2010s | 35.3% | 33.0% | 42.1% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Belarus?
- Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Belarus was 35.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 42.1% in 2016.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 33.0% in 2017.
- How does Belarus rank for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Belarus ranks 8th out of 37 countries with data for 2019.
- Is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population