Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Belarus
Belarus: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social was 43.2% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
In 2019, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Belarus stood at 43.2%.
The figure is up 4.6% on the previous year and up 26.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Belarus peaked at 76.9% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 32.0%, in 2012.
That places Belarus 15th out of 35 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Belarus, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 35.2% | — |
| 2009 | 34.0% | -3.4% |
| 2010 | 36.3% | +6.7% |
| 2012 | 32.0% | -12.0% |
| 2013 | 32.0% | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 36.4% | +14.0% |
| 2015 | 36.5% | +0.3% |
| 2016 | 76.9% | +110.5% |
| 2017 | 38.4% | -50.1% |
| 2018 | 41.3% | +7.6% |
| 2019 | 43.2% | +4.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.6% | 34.0% | 35.2% | 2 |
| 2010s | 41.4% | 32.0% | 76.9% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Belarus?
- Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Belarus was 43.2% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 76.9% in 2016.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 32.0% in 2012.
- How does Belarus rank for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Belarus ranks 15th out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
- Is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 26.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population