Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor in Poland
Poland: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor was 0.0005 <$2.15 a day in 2019. ▼ Falling
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor in Poland, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in <$2.15 a day.
Analysis
Poland recorded 0.0005 <$2.15 a day for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 9 years on record.
The figure is down 98.0% on the previous year and down 98.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor in Poland peaked at 0.0348 <$2.15 a day in 2009 and was at its lowest, 0.0005 <$2.15 a day, in 2019.
Poland ranks 26th of 27 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor in Poland, year by year
| Year | <$2.15 a day | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 0.0284 <$2.15 a day | — |
| 2009 | 0.0348 <$2.15 a day | +22.4% |
| 2010 | 0.0314 <$2.15 a day | -9.6% |
| 2011 | 0.0286 <$2.15 a day | -8.9% |
| 2012 | 0.0288 <$2.15 a day | +0.6% |
| 2015 | 0.021 <$2.15 a day | -27.0% |
| 2016 | 0.0175 <$2.15 a day | -16.9% |
| 2017 | 0.023 <$2.15 a day | +31.8% |
| 2019 | 0.0005 <$2.15 a day | -98.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0316 <$2.15 a day | 0.0284 <$2.15 a day | 0.0348 <$2.15 a day | 2 |
| 2010s | 0.0215 <$2.15 a day | 0.0005 <$2.15 a day | 0.0314 <$2.15 a day | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 23 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 0.0058 <$2.15 a day compare
- 24 Peru 0.0038 <$2.15 a day compare
- 25 El Salvador 0.0014 <$2.15 a day compare
- 27 Uruguay 0 <$2.15 a day compare
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor in Poland?
- Benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor in Poland was 0.0005 <$2.15 a day in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0348 <$2.15 a day in 2009.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0005 <$2.15 a day in 2019.
- How does Poland rank for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor?
- Poland ranks 26th out of 27 countries with data for 2019.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 98.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor (<$2.15 a day). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in International Private Transfers programs (%)