Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor in Chile
Chile: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor was 0.006 <$2.15 a day in 2022. ▼ Falling
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor in Chile, 2011–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in <$2.15 a day.
Analysis
The most recent figure for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor in Chile is 0.006 <$2.15 a day, measured in 2022. That is the lowest value across all 5 years on record.
That represents a change of down 61.5% on the previous year and down 55.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor in Chile peaked at 0.0203 <$2.15 a day in 2017 and was at its lowest, 0.006 <$2.15 a day, in 2022.
That places Chile 22nd out of 27 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor in Chile, year by year
| Year | <$2.15 a day | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 0.0134 <$2.15 a day | — |
| 2013 | 0.0191 <$2.15 a day | +41.8% |
| 2017 | 0.0203 <$2.15 a day | +6.8% |
| 2020 | 0.0155 <$2.15 a day | -23.8% |
| 2022 | 0.006 <$2.15 a day | -61.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0176 <$2.15 a day | 0.0134 <$2.15 a day | 0.0203 <$2.15 a day | 3 |
| 2020s | 0.0107 <$2.15 a day | 0.006 <$2.15 a day | 0.0155 <$2.15 a day | 2 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 19 Türkiye 0.0249 <$2.15 a day compare
- 20 Costa Rica 0.0147 <$2.15 a day compare
- 21 Ecuador 0.0066 <$2.15 a day compare
- 23 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 0.0058 <$2.15 a day compare
- 24 Peru 0.0038 <$2.15 a day compare
- 25 El Salvador 0.0014 <$2.15 a day compare
More work & labour data for Chile
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.14 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.14 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.62 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.2334 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 19,028 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,690 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 6,735 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 6,695 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 13,431 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor in Chile?
- Benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor in Chile was 0.006 <$2.15 a day in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0203 <$2.15 a day in 2017.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.006 <$2.15 a day in 2022.
- How does Chile rank for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor?
- Chile ranks 22nd out of 27 countries with data for 2022.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 55.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor (<$2.15 a day). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in International Private Transfers programs (%)