Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile in Mongolia
Mongolia: Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile was 0.3701 poorest in 2020. ▲ Rising
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile in Mongolia, 2007–2020
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in poorest.
Analysis
Mongolia recorded 0.3701 poorest for benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile in 2020. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 13.9% on the previous year and up 26.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile in Mongolia peaked at 0.3701 poorest in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0.29 poorest, in 2007.
That places Mongolia 11th out of 37 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile in Mongolia, year by year
| Year | poorest | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0.29 poorest | — |
| 2009 | 0.3183 poorest | +9.7% |
| 2010 | 0.2927 poorest | -8.0% |
| 2011 | 0.2978 poorest | +1.7% |
| 2012 | 0.3028 poorest | +1.7% |
| 2014 | 0.305 poorest | +0.7% |
| 2016 | 0.3235 poorest | +6.1% |
| 2018 | 0.3248 poorest | +0.4% |
| 2020 | 0.3701 poorest | +13.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.3042 poorest | 0.29 poorest | 0.3183 poorest | 2 |
| 2010s | 0.3078 poorest | 0.2927 poorest | 0.3248 poorest | 6 |
| 2020s | 0.3701 poorest | 0.3701 poorest | 0.3701 poorest | 1 |
Countries ranked near Mongolia
- 9 Armenia 0.3754 poorest compare
- 10 Kyrgyzstan 0.3738 poorest compare
- 12 Kazakhstan 0.3604 poorest compare
- 13 Indonesia 0.3482 poorest compare
- 14 Georgia 0.3413 poorest compare
More work & labour data for Mongolia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.1039 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.1076 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0999 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.07 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.05 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 3,167 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 908.11 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,756 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,763 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 5,519 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile in Mongolia?
- Benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile in Mongolia was 0.3701 poorest in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile recorded in Mongolia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.3701 poorest in 2020.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile recorded in Mongolia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.29 poorest in 2007.
- How does Mongolia rank for benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile?
- Mongolia ranks 11th out of 37 countries with data for 2020.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile rising or falling in Mongolia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 26.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Mongolia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in SPL programs (%)