Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile was 0.1212 poorest in 2022. ▲ Rising
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile in Costa Rica, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in poorest.
Analysis
The most recent figure for benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile in Costa Rica is 0.1212 poorest, measured in 2022.
The figure is down 2.5% on the previous year and up 16.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile in Costa Rica peaked at 0.1704 poorest in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0.0987 poorest, in 2014.
That places Costa Rica 31st out of 37 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 13 years of available data.
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | poorest | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 0.1556 poorest | — |
| 2010 | 0.1093 poorest | -29.7% |
| 2011 | 0.1063 poorest | -2.8% |
| 2012 | 0.1043 poorest | -1.9% |
| 2014 | 0.0987 poorest | -5.4% |
| 2015 | 0.1065 poorest | +7.9% |
| 2016 | 0.1174 poorest | +10.3% |
| 2017 | 0.1373 poorest | +16.9% |
| 2018 | 0.1331 poorest | -3.0% |
| 2019 | 0.1292 poorest | -2.9% |
| 2020 | 0.1704 poorest | +31.8% |
| 2021 | 0.1244 poorest | -27.0% |
| 2022 | 0.1212 poorest | -2.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1556 poorest | 0.1556 poorest | 0.1556 poorest | 1 |
| 2010s | 0.1158 poorest | 0.0987 poorest | 0.1373 poorest | 9 |
| 2020s | 0.1387 poorest | 0.1212 poorest | 0.1704 poorest | 3 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
More work & labour data for Costa Rica
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.9965 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.9952 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.9977 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.61 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.29 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 5,205 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 569.35 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,908 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,868 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 3,776 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile in Costa Rica?
- Benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile in Costa Rica was 0.1212 poorest in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1704 poorest in 2020.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0987 poorest in 2014.
- How does Costa Rica rank for benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile?
- Costa Rica ranks 31st out of 37 countries with data for 2022.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in SPL programs (%)