Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor - 1st quintile in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor - 1st quintile was 0.3549 in 2020. ▲ Rising
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor - 1st quintile in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor - 1st quintile in Kyrgyzstan is 0.3549, measured in 2020.
The figure is down 3.7% on the previous year and up 2.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor - 1st quintile in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 0.391 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0.3003, in 2006.
That places Kyrgyzstan 13th out of 36 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor - 1st quintile in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 0.3003 | — |
| 2011 | 0.3471 | +15.6% |
| 2012 | 0.3724 | +7.3% |
| 2013 | 0.391 | +5.0% |
| 2014 | 0.3782 | -3.3% |
| 2015 | 0.3458 | -8.6% |
| 2016 | 0.3799 | +9.9% |
| 2017 | 0.3849 | +1.3% |
| 2018 | 0.363 | -5.7% |
| 2019 | 0.3688 | +1.6% |
| 2020 | 0.3549 | -3.7% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 0.3549 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.1248, 2.8× the median. (5 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's 0.3549 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.392, 91% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.3003 | 0.3003 | 0.3003 | 1 |
| 2010s | 0.3701 | 0.3458 | 0.391 | 9 |
| 2020s | 0.3549 | 0.3549 | 0.3549 | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor - 1st quintile in Kyrgyzstan?
- Benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor - 1st quintile in Kyrgyzstan was 0.3549 in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor - 1st quintile recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.391 in 2013.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor - 1st quintile recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3003 in 2006.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor - 1st quintile?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th out of 36 countries with data for 2020.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor - 1st quintile rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in SPL programs (%)