Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Insurance -1st quintile in Brazil
Brazil: Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Insurance -1st quintile was 0.0896 poorest in 2022. ▼ Falling
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Insurance -1st quintile in Brazil, 2006–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in poorest.
Analysis
Brazil recorded 0.0896 poorest for benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance -1st quintile in 2022.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 27.6% on the previous year and down 23.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance -1st quintile in Brazil peaked at 0.1196 poorest in 2015 and was at its lowest, 0.0702 poorest, in 2021.
That places Brazil 21st out of 34 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 12 years of available data.
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Insurance -1st quintile in Brazil, year by year
| Year | poorest | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 0.0838 poorest | — |
| 2009 | 0.0926 poorest | +10.4% |
| 2011 | 0.1123 poorest | +21.3% |
| 2012 | 0.117 poorest | +4.2% |
| 2015 | 0.1196 poorest | +2.3% |
| 2016 | 0.0836 poorest | -30.1% |
| 2017 | 0.0843 poorest | +0.8% |
| 2018 | 0.0816 poorest | -3.2% |
| 2019 | 0.0785 poorest | -3.7% |
| 2020 | 0.0903 poorest | +14.9% |
| 2021 | 0.0702 poorest | -22.2% |
| 2022 | 0.0896 poorest | +27.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0882 poorest | 0.0838 poorest | 0.0926 poorest | 2 |
| 2010s | 0.0967 poorest | 0.0785 poorest | 0.1196 poorest | 7 |
| 2020s | 0.0834 poorest | 0.0702 poorest | 0.0903 poorest | 3 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 18 Pakistan 0.1502 poorest compare
- 19 Viet Nam 0.14 poorest compare
- 20 Argentina 0.1143 poorest compare
- 22 Côte d'Ivoire 0.0894 poorest compare
- 23 Dominican Republic 0.0861 poorest compare
- 24 Costa Rica 0.0642 poorest compare
More work & labour data for Brazil
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.7328 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.7065 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.7581 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.74 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.1001 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 215,063 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 17,625 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 82,304 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 81,060 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 163,364 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance -1st quintile in Brazil?
- Benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance -1st quintile in Brazil was 0.0896 poorest in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance -1st quintile recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1196 poorest in 2015.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance -1st quintile recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0702 poorest in 2021.
- How does Brazil rank for benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance -1st quintile?
- Brazil ranks 21st out of 34 countries with data for 2022.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance -1st quintile rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is down 23.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Insurance -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Social Insurance programs (%)