Benefit-cost ratio: All Social Insurance 1st … urban Insurance in Belarus
Belarus: Benefit-cost ratio: All Social Insurance 1st … urban Insurance was 0.475 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Insurance - 1st quintile (poorest) in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 0.475 for benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance - 1st quintile (poorest) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.9% on the previous year and up 10.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance - 1st quintile (poorest) in Belarus peaked at 0.475 in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0.3917, in 2008.
Belarus ranks 2nd of 34 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Benefit-cost ratio: All Social Insurance 1st … urban Insurance in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 0.3917 | — |
| 2009 | 0.4301 | +9.8% |
| 2010 | 0.4173 | -3.0% |
| 2012 | 0.417 | -0.1% |
| 2013 | 0.4398 | +5.5% |
| 2014 | 0.4406 | +0.2% |
| 2015 | 0.4422 | +0.4% |
| 2016 | 0.4545 | +2.8% |
| 2017 | 0.4477 | -1.5% |
| 2018 | 0.4663 | +4.1% |
| 2019 | 0.475 | +1.9% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 0.475 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.1531, 3.1× the median. (22 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 0.475 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.3771, 1.3× the median. (11 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4109 | 0.3917 | 0.4301 | 2 |
| 2010s | 0.4445 | 0.417 | 0.475 | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance - 1st quintile (poorest) in Belarus?
- Benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance - 1st quintile (poorest) in Belarus was 0.475 in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance - 1st quintile (poorest) recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0.475 in 2019.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance - 1st quintile (poorest) recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3917 in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance - 1st quintile (poorest)?
- Belarus ranks 2nd out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance - 1st quintile (poorest) rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 10.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Insurance - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Social Insurance programs (%)