Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Insurance -1st quintile (poorest) in Belarus

Belarus: Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Insurance -1st quintile (poorest) was 0.4472 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
0.4472
Change on year
up 0.0%
World rank
2nd
of 31 countries
All-time high
0.4472
in 2019
All-time low
0.405
in 2009
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Insurance -1st quintile (poorest) in Belarus, 2008–2019

00.10.20.30.42008201320192008: 0.4082009: 0.4052010: 0.4132012: 0.4212013: 0.4142014: 0.4112015: 0.4212016: 0.4352017: 0.4432018: 0.4472019: 0.447

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 0.4472 for benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance -1st quintile (poorest) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 10.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance -1st quintile (poorest) in Belarus peaked at 0.4472 in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0.405, in 2009.

That places Belarus 2nd out of 31 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Insurance -1st quintile (poorest) in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Insurance -1st quintile (poorest) -rural in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 0.4077
2009 0.405 -0.7%
2010 0.413 +2.0%
2012 0.4211 +2.0%
2013 0.4145 -1.6%
2014 0.4105 -1.0%
2015 0.4214 +2.6%
2016 0.4351 +3.2%
2017 0.4433 +1.9%
2018 0.4471 +0.9%
2019 0.4472 +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0.4063 0.405 0.4077 2
2010s 0.4281 0.4105 0.4472 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 1 Republic of Moldova 0.4831 compare
  2. 3 Ukraine 0.4326 compare
  3. 4 Poland 0.385 compare
  4. 5 Serbia 0.3802 compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance -1st quintile (poorest) in Belarus?
Benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance -1st quintile (poorest) in Belarus was 0.4472 in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance -1st quintile (poorest) recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 0.4472 in 2019.
What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance -1st quintile (poorest) recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 0.405 in 2009.
How does Belarus rank for benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance -1st quintile (poorest)?
Belarus ranks 2nd out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
Is benefit-cost ratio - all social insurance -1st quintile (poorest) rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 10.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Insurance -1st quintile (poorest) -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Insurance -1st quintile (poorest) in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-all-social-insurance-1st-quintile-poorest-rural/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-all-social-insurance-1st-quintile-poorest-rural/belarus/">Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Insurance -1st quintile (poorest) in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Insurance -1st quintile (poorest) -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 292 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Social Insurance programs (%)