Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic in Poland

Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic was 24.8% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
24.8%
Change on year
down 1.9%
World rank
7th
of 31 countries
All-time high
25.2%
in 2017
All-time low
20.3%
in 2005
Years of data
12
2005–2019

Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic in Poland, 2005–2019

01020302005201220192005: 20.32006: 20.72007: 21.62008: 22.22009: 21.72010: 21.62011: 21.52012: 21.82015: 23.72016: 23.82017: 25.22019: 24.8

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic in Poland stood at 24.8%.

The figure is down 1.9% on the previous year and up 13.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic in Poland peaked at 25.2% in 2017 and was at its lowest, 20.3%, in 2005.

Poland ranks 7th of 31 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.

Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic in Poland, year by year

Annual values for Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Poland, 2005 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2005 20.3%
2006 20.7% +1.7%
2007 21.6% +4.5%
2008 22.2% +2.7%
2009 21.7% -2.1%
2010 21.6% -0.4%
2011 21.5% -0.9%
2012 21.8% +1.8%
2015 23.7% +8.4%
2016 23.8% +0.8%
2017 25.2% +5.8%
2019 24.8% -1.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 21.3% 20.3% 22.2% 5
2010s 23.2% 21.5% 25.2% 7

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 4 Viet Nam 28.0% compare
  2. 5 Pakistan 25.7% compare
  3. 6 Kyrgyzstan 24.9% compare
  4. 8 Burkina Faso 22.4% compare
  5. 9 Mongolia 22.0% compare
  6. 10 Belarus 21.1% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More work & labour data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic in Poland?
Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic in Poland was 24.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 25.2% in 2017.
What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 20.3% in 2005.
How does Poland rank for beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic?
Poland ranks 7th out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
Is beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is up 13.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-domestic-private-transfers/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-domestic-private-transfers/poland/">Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic in Poland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 321 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population