Beneficiary incidence: Domestic Private … 5th Domestic Private in Moldova

Moldova: Beneficiary incidence: Domestic Private … 5th Domestic Private was 29.6% in 2018. ▼ Falling

Latest (2018)
29.6%
Change on year
down 19.9%
World rank
1st
of 31 countries
All-time high
44.2%
in 2012
All-time low
29.6%
in 2018
Years of data
5
2010–2018

Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic in Moldova, 2010–2018

0102030402010201420182010: 39.42012: 44.22013: 42.72017: 36.92018: 29.6

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic in Moldova is 29.6%, measured in 2018. That is the lowest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 19.9% on the previous year and down 24.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic in Moldova peaked at 44.2% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 29.6%, in 2018.

Moldova ranks 1st of 31 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Beneficiary incidence: Domestic Private … 5th Domestic Private in Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Moldova, 2010 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2010 39.4% —
2012 44.2% +12.2%
2013 42.7% -3.4%
2017 36.9% -13.5%
2018 29.6% -19.9%

Moldova compared with similar countries

  • Moldova's 29.6% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 15.0%, 2.0× the median. (19 countries reporting)
  • Moldova's 29.6% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 24.8%, 1.2× the median. (9 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 2 Kazakhstan 29.2% compare
  2. 3 Armenia 28.4% compare
  3. 4 Vietnam 28.0% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More work & labour data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic in Moldova?
Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic in Moldova was 29.6% in 2018, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 44.2% in 2012.
What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 29.6% in 2018.
How does Moldova rank for beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic?
Moldova ranks 1st out of 31 countries with data for 2018.
Is beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is down 24.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic in Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-domestic-private-transfers/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-domestic-private-transfers/moldova/">Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic in Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 321 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population