Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic in Poland
Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic was 24.5% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2019, beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic in Poland stood at 24.5%.
The figure is down 0.2% on the previous year and up 13.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic in Poland peaked at 24.5% in 2017 and was at its lowest, 20.5%, in 2005.
Poland ranks 6th of 31 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.
Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 20.5% | — |
| 2006 | 21.0% | +2.4% |
| 2007 | 21.7% | +3.6% |
| 2008 | 22.2% | +2.1% |
| 2009 | 21.6% | -2.6% |
| 2010 | 21.5% | -0.6% |
| 2011 | 21.5% | -0.2% |
| 2012 | 21.4% | -0.2% |
| 2015 | 23.1% | +7.5% |
| 2016 | 23.9% | +3.8% |
| 2017 | 24.5% | +2.4% |
| 2019 | 24.5% | -0.2% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 24.5% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 21.7%, 1.1× the median. (9 countries reporting)
- Poland's 24.5% is above the median for high income countries, which is 13.3%, 1.8× the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.4% | 20.5% | 22.2% | 5 |
| 2010s | 22.9% | 21.4% | 24.5% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 3 Kazakhstan 27.6% compare
- 4 Armenia 26.4% compare
- 5 Pakistan 24.7% compare
- 7 Burkina Faso 23.4% compare
- 8 Kyrgyzstan 21.7% compare
- 9 Mongolia 20.4% compare
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic in Poland?
- Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic in Poland was 24.5% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 24.5% in 2017.
- What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 20.5% in 2005.
- How does Poland rank for beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic?
- Poland ranks 6th out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
- Is beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 13.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population