Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic in Belarus

Belarus: Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic was 20.2% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
20.2%
Change on year
down 7.9%
World rank
10th
of 31 countries
All-time high
21.9%
in 2018
All-time low
18.3%
in 2017
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic in Belarus, 2008–2019

051015202008201320192008: 19.82009: 19.82010: 19.62012: 20.12013: 21.32014: 20.62015: 20.92016: 20.42017: 18.32018: 21.92019: 20.2

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic in Belarus stood at 20.2%.

The figure is down 7.9% on the previous year and up 2.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic in Belarus peaked at 21.9% in 2018 and was at its lowest, 18.3%, in 2017.

Belarus ranks 10th of 31 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 19.8%
2009 19.8% -0.3%
2010 19.6% -0.7%
2012 20.1% +2.1%
2013 21.3% +6.2%
2014 20.6% -3.2%
2015 20.9% +1.6%
2016 20.4% -2.4%
2017 18.3% -10.6%
2018 21.9% +20.2%
2019 20.2% -7.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 19.8% 19.8% 19.8% 2
2010s 20.4% 18.3% 21.9% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 7 Burkina Faso 23.4% compare
  2. 8 Kyrgyzstan 21.7% compare
  3. 9 Mongolia 20.4% compare
  4. 11 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 19.3% compare
  5. 12 Malawi 19.1% compare
  6. 13 Romania 18.6% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic in Belarus?
Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic in Belarus was 20.2% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 21.9% in 2018.
What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 18.3% in 2017.
How does Belarus rank for beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic?
Belarus ranks 10th out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
Is beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 2.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-urban/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-urban/belarus/">Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 319 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population