Beneficiary incidence: Domestic Private … 5th Domestic preT in Moldova

Moldova: Beneficiary incidence: Domestic Private … 5th Domestic preT was 30.8% in 2018. ▼ Falling

Latest (2018)
30.8%
Change on year
down 6.5%
World rank
1st
of 31 countries
All-time high
41.4%
in 2012
All-time low
30.8%
in 2018
Years of data
5
2010–2018

Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic in Moldova, 2010–2018

0102030402010201420182010: 37.1 preT2012: 41.4 preT2013: 39.1 preT2017: 32.9 preT2018: 30.8 preT

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.

Analysis

Moldova recorded 30.8% for beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic in 2018. That is the lowest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of down 6.5% on the previous year and down 17.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic in Moldova peaked at 41.4% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 30.8%, in 2018.

Moldova ranks 1st of 31 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Beneficiary incidence: Domestic Private … 5th Domestic preT in Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT) in Moldova, 2010 to 2018.
Year preT Change
2010 37.1% —
2012 41.4% +11.7%
2013 39.1% -5.5%
2017 32.9% -15.8%
2018 30.8% -6.5%

Moldova compared with similar countries

  • Moldova's 30.8% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 14.7%, 2.1× the median. (19 countries reporting)
  • Moldova's 30.8% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 24.4%, 1.3× the median. (9 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 2 Kazakhstan 30.0% compare
  2. 3 Vietnam 26.6% compare
  3. 4 Armenia 25.9% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More work & labour data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic in Moldova?
Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic in Moldova was 30.8% in 2018, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 41.4% in 2012.
What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 30.8% in 2018.
How does Moldova rank for beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic?
Moldova ranks 1st out of 31 countries with data for 2018.
Is beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is down 17.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic in Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-pret/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-pret/moldova/">Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic in Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT)
Unit
preT
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 321 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population