Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Belarus

Belarus: Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social was 16.0% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
16.0%
Change on year
down 2.1%
World rank
11th
of 37 countries
All-time high
16.4%
in 2009
All-time low
12.8%
in 2012
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Belarus, 2008–2019

0510152008201320192008: 162009: 16.42010: 162012: 12.82013: 13.92014: 14.12015: 16.32016: 14.32017: 16.22018: 16.32019: 16

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 16.0% for beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in 2019.

The figure is down 2.1% on the previous year and down 2.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Belarus peaked at 16.4% in 2009 and was at its lowest, 12.8%, in 2012.

That places Belarus 11th out of 37 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Assistance -rural in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 16.0%
2009 16.4% +2.4%
2010 16.0% -2.3%
2012 12.8% -20.0%
2013 13.9% +8.8%
2014 14.1% +0.8%
2015 16.3% +16.2%
2016 14.3% -12.7%
2017 16.2% +14.0%
2018 16.3% +0.6%
2019 16.0% -2.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 16.2% 16.0% 16.4% 2
2010s 15.1% 12.8% 16.3% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 8 Malawi 17.3% compare
  2. 9 Russian Federation 16.1% compare
  3. 10 Côte d'Ivoire 16.1% compare
  4. 12 South Africa 15.5% compare
  5. 13 Indonesia 15.2% compare
  6. 14 Mongolia 15.1% compare

See the full ranking of 37 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Belarus?
Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Belarus was 16.0% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 16.4% in 2009.
What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 12.8% in 2012.
How does Belarus rank for beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
Belarus ranks 11th out of 37 countries with data for 2019.
Is beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is down 2.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-all-social-assistance-rural/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-all-social-assistance-rural/belarus/">Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Assistance -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
37 places, 365 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population