Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash was 10.7% in 2021. ▲ Rising

Latest (2021)
10.7%
Change on year
down 0.5%
World rank
23rd
of 27 countries
All-time high
19.6%
in 2014
All-time low
5.1%
in 2007
Years of data
9
2007–2021

Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kazakhstan, 2007–2021

51015202007201420212007: 5.12010: 10.52014: 19.62015: 16.12017: 13.52018: 13.32019: 11.52020: 10.82021: 10.7

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Kazakhstan recorded 10.7% for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash in 2021.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.5% on the previous year and up 1.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Kazakhstan peaked at 19.6% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 5.1%, in 2007.

Kazakhstan ranks 23rd of 27 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kazakhstan, year by year

Annual values for Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural in Kazakhstan, 2007 to 2021.
Year Value Change
2007 5.1%
2010 10.5% +106.0%
2014 19.6% +86.3%
2015 16.1% -17.9%
2017 13.5% -16.4%
2018 13.3% -1.0%
2019 11.5% -13.7%
2020 10.8% -6.2%
2021 10.7% -0.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 5.1% 5.1% 5.1% 1
2010s 14.1% 10.5% 19.6% 6
2020s 10.8% 10.7% 10.8% 2

Countries ranked near Kazakhstan

  1. 20 Sri Lanka 12.6% compare
  2. 21 Costa Rica 11.1% compare
  3. 22 Georgia 10.8% compare
  4. 24 Kosovo 8.2% compare
  5. 24 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 8.2% compare
  6. 26 Serbia 6.8% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Kazakhstan

All data for Kazakhstan →

Frequently asked questions

What is beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Kazakhstan?
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Kazakhstan was 10.7% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Kazakhstan?
The highest recorded value was 19.6% in 2014.
What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Kazakhstan?
The lowest recorded value was 5.1% in 2007.
How does Kazakhstan rank for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
Kazakhstan ranks 23rd out of 27 countries with data for 2021.
Is beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
Over the last ten years it is up 1.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kazakhstan. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-4th-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-rural/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-4th-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-rural/kazakhstan/">Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kazakhstan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 230 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population