Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Social Pensions in Poland

Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Social Pensions was 8.6% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
8.6%
Change on year
down 23.7%
World rank
17th
of 25 countries
All-time high
11.5%
in 2009
All-time low
8.2%
in 2007
Years of data
12
2005–2019

Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Social Pensions in Poland, 2005–2019

02.557.51012.52005201220192005: 8.6 preT2006: 8.8 preT2007: 8.2 preT2008: 9.3 preT2009: 11.5 preT2010: 9.4 preT2011: 9.3 preT2012: 10.7 preT2015: 9 preT2016: 9.8 preT2017: 11.3 preT2019: 8.6 preT

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.

Analysis

In 2019, beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - social pensions in Poland stood at 8.6%.

The figure is down 23.7% on the previous year and down 25.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - social pensions in Poland peaked at 11.5% in 2009 and was at its lowest, 8.2%, in 2007.

That places Poland 17th out of 25 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.

Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Social Pensions in Poland, year by year

Annual values for Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Social Pensions (preT) in Poland, 2005 to 2019.
Year preT Change
2005 8.6%
2006 8.8% +2.2%
2007 8.2% -6.5%
2008 9.3% +14.0%
2009 11.5% +23.5%
2010 9.4% -18.4%
2011 9.3% -0.8%
2012 10.7% +14.5%
2015 9.0% -16.2%
2016 9.8% +9.6%
2017 11.3% +15.0%
2019 8.6% -23.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 9.3% 8.2% 11.5% 5
2010s 9.7% 8.6% 11.3% 7

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 14 Romania 10.5% compare
  2. 15 Sri Lanka 10.3% compare
  3. 16 Costa Rica 9.3% compare
  4. 18 Panama 8.4% compare
  5. 19 Russian Federation 8.1% compare
  6. 20 Peru 7.9% compare

See the full ranking of 25 places →

More work & labour data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - social pensions in Poland?
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - social pensions in Poland was 8.6% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - social pensions recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 11.5% in 2009.
What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - social pensions recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 8.2% in 2007.
How does Poland rank for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - social pensions?
Poland ranks 17th out of 25 countries with data for 2019.
Is beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - social pensions rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is down 25.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Social Pensions (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Social Pensions in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-4th-quintile-percent-social-pensions-pret/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-4th-quintile-percent-social-pensions-pret/poland/">Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Social Pensions in Poland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Social Pensions (preT)
Unit
preT
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
25 places, 222 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population