Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Moldova

Moldova: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers was 25.7% in 2018. ▬ Flat

Latest (2018)
25.7%
Change on year
up 6.6%
World rank
2nd
of 31 countries
All-time high
27.9%
in 2012
All-time low
17.6%
in 2013
Years of data
5
2010–2018

Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Moldova, 2010–2018

01020302010201420182010: 24.82012: 27.92013: 17.62017: 24.12018: 25.7

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Moldova is 25.7%, measured in 2018.

That represents a change of up 6.6% on the previous year and up 3.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Moldova peaked at 27.9% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 17.6%, in 2013.

That places Moldova 2nd out of 31 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the top 10%.

Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Moldova, 2010 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2010 24.8% —
2012 27.9% +12.4%
2013 17.6% -37.0%
2017 24.1% +37.2%
2018 25.7% +6.6%

Moldova compared with similar countries

  • Moldova's 25.7% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 18.9%, 1.4× the median. (19 countries reporting)
  • Moldova's 25.7% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 20.3%, 1.3× the median. (9 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 1 Vietnam 26.8% compare
  2. 3 Pakistan 23.2% compare
  3. 4 Mongolia 23.1% compare
  4. 5 Poland 22.8% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More work & labour data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Moldova?
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Moldova was 25.7% in 2018, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 27.9% in 2012.
What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 17.6% in 2013.
How does Moldova rank for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
Moldova ranks 2nd out of 31 countries with data for 2018.
Is beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is up 3.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-4th-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-4th-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers/moldova/">Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 321 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population