Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private in Belarus

Belarus: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private was 20.6% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
20.6%
Change on year
up 4.8%
World rank
8th
of 31 countries
All-time high
20.6%
in 2019
All-time low
18.1%
in 2012
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private in Belarus, 2008–2019

051015202008201320192008: 192009: 18.92010: 20.22012: 18.12013: 19.32014: 202015: 19.62016: 19.42017: 18.52018: 19.62019: 20.6

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private in Belarus is 20.6%, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.

That represents a change of up 4.8% on the previous year and up 8.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private in Belarus peaked at 20.6% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 18.1%, in 2012.

Belarus ranks 8th of 31 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 19.0%
2009 18.9% -0.2%
2010 20.2% +6.9%
2012 18.1% -10.3%
2013 19.3% +6.2%
2014 20.0% +3.5%
2015 19.6% -1.7%
2016 19.4% -1.0%
2017 18.5% -4.6%
2018 19.6% +5.9%
2019 20.6% +4.8%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 19.0% 18.9% 19.0% 2
2010s 19.5% 18.1% 20.6% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 5 Viet Nam 21.2% compare
  2. 6 Kazakhstan 21.1% compare
  3. 7 Mongolia 20.8% compare
  4. 9 Türkiye 20.2% compare
  5. 10 Armenia 20.1% compare
  6. 11 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 19.3% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private in Belarus?
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private in Belarus was 20.6% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 20.6% in 2019.
What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 18.1% in 2012.
How does Belarus rank for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private?
Belarus ranks 8th out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
Is beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 8.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-4th-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers-urban/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-4th-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers-urban/belarus/">Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 319 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population