Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Serbia

Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash was 14.8% in 2022. ▼ Falling

Latest (2022)
14.8%
Change on year
up 53.2%
World rank
21st
of 30 countries
All-time high
17.6%
in 2007
All-time low
9.6%
in 2021
Years of data
8
2007–2022

Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Serbia, 2007–2022

051015202007201420222007: 17.6 preT2010: 15.8 preT2013: 15.9 preT2015: 14.1 preT2018: 14.2 preT2019: 14.3 preT2021: 9.6 preT2022: 14.8 preT

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.

Analysis

In 2022, beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Serbia stood at 14.8%.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 53.2% on the previous year and down 7.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Serbia peaked at 17.6% in 2007 and was at its lowest, 9.6%, in 2021.

That places Serbia 21st out of 30 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.

Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Serbia, year by year

Annual values for Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT) in Serbia, 2007 to 2022.
Year preT Change
2007 17.6%
2010 15.8% -10.1%
2013 15.9% +0.7%
2015 14.1% -11.5%
2018 14.2% +0.5%
2019 14.3% +0.9%
2021 9.6% -32.5%
2022 14.8% +53.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 17.6% 17.6% 17.6% 1
2010s 14.8% 14.1% 15.9% 5
2020s 12.2% 9.6% 14.8% 2

Countries ranked near Serbia

  1. 18 Republic of Moldova 17.0% compare
  2. 19 Belarus 16.7% compare
  3. 20 Pakistan 16.7% compare
  4. 22 Albania 14.1% compare
  5. 23 Argentina 14.1% compare
  6. 24 Armenia 13.0% compare

See the full ranking of 30 places →

More work & labour data for Serbia

All data for Serbia →

Frequently asked questions

What is beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Serbia?
Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Serbia was 14.8% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Serbia?
The highest recorded value was 17.6% in 2007.
What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Serbia?
The lowest recorded value was 9.6% in 2021.
How does Serbia rank for beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
Serbia ranks 21st out of 30 countries with data for 2022.
Is beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash rising or falling in Serbia?
Over the last ten years it is down 7.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Serbia data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Serbia. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-3rd-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-pret/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-3rd-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-pret/serbia/">Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Serbia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT)
Unit
preT
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
30 places, 256 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population