Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private in Belarus

Belarus: Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private was 19.0% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
19.0%
Change on year
down 0.6%
World rank
22nd
of 31 countries
All-time high
20.9%
in 2017
All-time low
19.0%
in 2019
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private in Belarus, 2008–2019

051015202008201320192008: 19.72009: 20.32010: 19.42012: 20.52013: 192014: 19.12015: 202016: 19.92017: 20.92018: 19.12019: 19

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private in Belarus stood at 19.0%. That is the lowest value across all 11 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.6% on the previous year and down 6.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private in Belarus peaked at 20.9% in 2017 and was at its lowest, 19.0%, in 2019.

Belarus ranks 22nd of 31 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 19.7%
2009 20.3% +3.1%
2010 19.4% -4.4%
2012 20.5% +5.8%
2013 19.0% -7.3%
2014 19.1% +0.5%
2015 20.0% +4.4%
2016 19.9% -0.5%
2017 20.9% +5.1%
2018 19.1% -8.4%
2019 19.0% -0.6%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 20.0% 19.7% 20.3% 2
2010s 19.7% 19.0% 20.9% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 19 Viet Nam 19.4% compare
  2. 20 Paraguay 19.2% compare
  3. 21 Türkiye 19.1% compare
  4. 23 Georgia 18.6% compare
  5. 24 Argentina 18.4% compare
  6. 25 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 18.4% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private in Belarus?
Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private in Belarus was 19.0% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 20.9% in 2017.
What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 19.0% in 2019.
How does Belarus rank for beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private?
Belarus ranks 22nd out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
Is beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is down 6.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-3rd-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers-urban/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-3rd-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers-urban/belarus/">Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 319 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population